Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MICHAEL V. COSTELLO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

The United States Supreme Court Reversed the decision of this Court reported at 539 F.2d 547 (5th Cir. 1976), and remanded the case to this Court for further proceedings consistent with its opinion in Costello v. Wainwright, ___ U.S. ___, 97 S.Ct. 1191, 51 L.Ed.2d 372 (1977). The case was taken en banc for consideration of the three-judge court issue. The Court does not regard the remaining issues in the case to be enbancworthy. Therefore, the Court reinstates the panel opinion reported at 525 F.2d 1239 (5th Cir. 1976) as the decision in this case, and orders that the mandate be issued forthwith.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COSTELLO v. WAINWRIGHT
(May 31, 1977)