Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROBERT C. KAPLAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Robert C. Kaplan, challenges the sufficiency of an application for a search warrant made by a private citizen. We affirm.

Kaplan contends that a private citizen has no authority to apply for a search warrant. There is no Florida statute or rule restricting private citizens from signing applications for search warrants. Indeed, the firsthand quality of the information sworn to by a private citizen may be superior to hearsay statements presently allowed under the law to support search warrant applications. The same safeguards and other legal requirements for the issuance and service of search warrants apply regardless of who signs the application. We have also examined the contents of the application and find them sufficient to support the issuance of the warrant.

State v. Crisp, 307 So.2d 454 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); State v. Niles, 307 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

Sections 933.04 and 933.07, Florida Statutes (1975).

AFFIRMED.

MAGER, C.J., and ALDERMAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KAPLAN v. STATE
(May 27, 1977)