Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT COLEMAN, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

While the conduct of the Trial Judge cannot be described as commendable, in our view neither were his intrusions (to the extent that protest was made, expressly or by reasonable implication) such as to work a denial of defendant's right to a fair trial. Nor is there any substance to defendant's claim that subdivision 4 of section 160.15 of the Penal Law is unconstitutional (People v Clark, 41 N.Y.2d 612). We have examined defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. COLEMAN
(Jun 2, 1977)