Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Claim of NICHOLAS KOMINSKI, Respondent. LOUIS L. LEVINE, as Industrial Commissioner, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

We agree with the Appellate Division that the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board misinterpreted and misapplied subdivision 2 of section 598 of the Labor Law (L 1972, ch 396). The statute by its terms only applies when the Secretary of Labor of the United States finds that the application of subdivision 1 (Labor Law, § 598) is in conflict with the requirements of Federal law.

The history of the statute, as traced by the Appellate Division in its opinion, indicates that this was the sole intent of the Legislature in enacting subdivision 2. Since the Secretary of Labor made no finding as contemplated by the statute, there was no basis for recoupment of the moneys paid to the claimant.

Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF KOMINSKI
(Jun 2, 1977)