Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. NEIL MARTIN, Respondent.

Order affirmed on the memorandum at the Appellate Division. We would only add that while it was error for the trial court to exclude proof relative to defendant's intent and state of mind at the time he was interrogated before the Grand Jury, the trial court may, in its discretion, limit repetitious or clearly irrelevant testimony.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MARTIN
(Jun 14, 1977)