AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

DIME SAVINGS BANK OF WILLIAMSBURGH, Respondent, v. ANSHEL REALTY CORP. et al., Defendants, and EDWARD L. DUBROFF et al., as Executors, Appellants.

In a mortgage foreclosure action, defendants Dubroff and Messinger, as executors, appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 14, 1976, as directed that the receiver of the mortgaged premises pay the sum of $10,105.05 in his possession to the plaintiff. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Subdivision 4 of section 1371 Real Prop. Acts. of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law is clear and unambiguous and mandates affirmance, however inequitable the result may be. Any relief required to prevent a recurrence of this situation must come through a legislative amendment to subdivision 4 of section 1371 Real Prop. Acts. of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law and not by judicial interpretation of that section. Latham, J.P., Shapiro, Hawkins and Suozzi, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DIME SAV. BK OF WILLIAMSBURGH v. ANSHEL REALTY
(Jul 25, 1977)