Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HERBERT A. KAPLAN, APPELLANT, v. BEN CIAVARELLA AND FRANK CIAVARELLA, APPELLEES.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appealed is an Order for new trial after jury verdict which the court determined was not lawfully reached. The trial court held ". . . under no theory advanced either by the Plaintiffs or by the Defendant could the jury have lawfully reached its verdict of $19,075.00. This award is below the lowest amount which could possibly be reached under the evidence."

The Appellant has demonstrated and we find in the record a theory upon which the jury could have lawfully reached its verdict. Therefore the Order for new trial is reversed and the cause remanded for judgment on the verdict. Heymann v. Fusco, 132 So.2d 216 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

CROSS and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KAPLAN v. CIAVARELLA
(Aug 16, 1977)