Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ORZELL BILLINGSLEY, SR., MRS. BLANCHE McSWAIN, AND MRS. ESSIE MAE RICE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GEORGE G. SEIBELS, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Billingsley v. Seibels, 433 F. Supp. 1 (N.D.Ala. 1976).

Appellants seek to distinguish the principle of Jennings v. Caddo Parish School Bd., 531 F.2d 1331 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 897, 97 S.Ct. 260, 50 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976) on the ground that they were defendants in a state court action, rather than plaintiffs. This distinction does not appear to be sufficient to bring appellants within the rule announced in England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411, 84 S.Ct. 461, 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964). See Brown v. Chastain, 416 F.2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 951, 90 S.Ct. 976, 25 L.Ed.2d 134 (1970).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BILLINGSLEY v. SEIBELS
(Aug 24, 1977)