Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Dissolution of the Marriage of KESTERSON, Respondent, and KESTERSON, Appellant.

Before Schwab, Chief Judge, and Tanzer and Johnson, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. No costs to either party.

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue in this dissolution-of-marriage proceedings is who should have custody of two of the parties' three children. The judge awarded custody of all three of the children, aged 8 through 14, to the mother. The father contends he should have custody of the two younger children. The trial judge made it clear in his oral opinion that he thought there was not much to say for either of the parents, that the advantages and disadvantages of each were roughly comparable, and that keeping the three children together was the deciding factor in awarding custody to the mother. We agree. Starin and Starin, 29 Or. App. 557, 564 P.2d 748, Sup Ct review denied (1977); Sarty v. Forney, 12 Or. App. 25, 506 P.2d 535 (1973).

Affirmed. No costs to either party.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF THE DISSOLUTION, MARRIAGE OF KESTERSON
(Sep 12, 1977)