Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LOWE v. THE STATE.

WEBB, Judge.

In this appeal from a conviction of defendant on a charge of motor vehicle theft, there has been no compliance with Rule 18 of this court (Code Ann. § 24-3618) as to structure and content of the brief and enumerations of errors. There is no citation to the particular parts of the transcript about which complaint is made, consequently we are unable to consider the alleged grounds of complaint. Also, the general grounds for a new trial are addressed to the trial court. The weight of the evidence was considered by the jury at the trial and by the trial judge in ruling on the general grounds. Ridley v. State, 236 Ga. 147, 149 ( 223 S.E.2d 131) (1976); Brooks v. State, 141 Ga. App. 725, 739 (12) ( 234 S.E.2d 541) (1977). Our only question would be whether there is any evidence authorizing the verdict, and we find that there was.

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 6, 1977 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1977 — REHEARING DENIED OCTOBER 5, 1977 — CERT APPLIED FOR.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LOWE v. STATE
(Sep 19, 1977)