DOCK WATCH HOLLOW QUARRY PIT, INC. v. WARREN TP, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Frederick C. Mezey argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent ( Messrs. Mezey and Mezey, attorneys; Mr. Mezey, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. Mark L. Antin, on the brief). Mr. J. Albert Mastro argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant ( Mr. Mastro and Ms. Dolores A. Mastro, on the brief). Mr. Daniel F. O'Connell argued the cause for cross-respondent ( Messrs. Lanigan and O'Connell, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Frederick C. Mezey argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent ( Messrs. Mezey and Mezey, attorneys; Mr. Mezey, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. Mark L. Antin, on the brief). Mr. J. Albert Mastro argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant ( Mr. Mastro and Ms. Dolores A. Mastro, on the brief). Mr. Daniel F. O'Connell argued the cause for cross-respondent ( Messrs. Lanigan and O'Connell, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

DOCK WATCH HOLLOW QUARRY PIT, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF WARREN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT, AND THETOWNSHIP OF BRIDGEWATER, DEFENDANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT, AND THE STATE OF NEWJERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-CROSS-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division.

Justice Schreiber would affirm the judgment of the trial court as modified by the dissenting opinion of Judge Morgan, reported at 142 N.J. Super. 130.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and HANDLER — 6.

Dissenting — Justice SCHREIBER — 1.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

DOCK WATCH HOLLOW QUARRY PIT, INC. v. WARREN TP

DOCK WATCH HOLLOW QUARRY PIT, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF WARREN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT, AND THETOWNSHIP OF BRIDGEWATER, DEFENDANT-CROSS-RESPONDENT, AND THE STATE OF NEWJERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Comments