Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LARRY GURLEY, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed.

Defendant's present claim of error regarding the trial court's charge and that certain evidence was improperly received in evidence is unavailing. It is manifest that no alleged errors were preserved for our review by either exception or proper objection. His failure to take appropriate exception or to request further clarification at a time "when the court had an opportunity of effectively changing" any instruction preserved no question of law in connection therewith reviewable by this court (CPL 470.05, subd 2; People v Robinson, 36 N.Y.2d 224, 228-229; People v Kibbe, 35 N.Y.2d 407, 413-414). We have examined defendant's other arguments which we find to be without merit.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. GURLEY
(Oct 18, 1977)