AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of the Claim of MARIA MENNIS et al., Appellants, v. AMENDES CO. et al., Respondents. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

Appeal from a supplemental decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board, filed July 20, 1977, which determined that claimants were not dependents of the deceased employee and, therefore, denied their claim for death benefits. By an amended decision of this court (Matter of Mennis v Amendes Co., 56 A.D.2d 679) this case was remitted to the Workmen's Compensation Board for additional findings in clarification of its prior decision denying death benefits to claimants. On remittal the board found, in support of its decision denying benefits, that the testimony of the decedent's parents and brother concerning claimants' dependency on decedent was not credible. A reading of the record reveals inconsistencies and contradictions in the testimony of these witnesses. The question of credibility is strictly within the province of the board and its determination on questions of fact and credibility may not be disturbed by this court (Matter of Carpenter v Ceramic Systems, 44 A.D.2d 348; Matter of Walker v Frouge Constr. Co., 24 A.D.2d 775; Matter of Giocastro v New York City Tr. Auth., 24 A.D.2d 679). Since substantial evidence supports the board's determination, it must be affirmed (Matter of Maurer v Terminal Serv. Co., 46 A.D.2d 709). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J.P., Sweeney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MENNIS v. AMENDES CO
(Oct 20, 1977)