Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LIPPERT, APPELLANT, v. ENGLE, SUPT., ET AL., APPELLEES.

Mandamus — Not available, when — Appeal proper remedy.

Per Curiam.

Mandamus is not available where appellant has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law by way of appeal. See State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141; State, ex rel. Woodbury, v. Spitler (1974), 40 Ohio St.2d 1; State, ex rel. Racine, v. Dull (1975), 44 Ohio St.2d 72; and In re Singer (1976), 45 Ohio St.2d 130.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint, is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O'NEILL, C.J., HERBERT, CELEBREZZE, W. BROWN, P. BROWN, SWEENEY and LOCHER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LIPPERT v. ENGLE
(Nov 16, 1977)