AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN DEODATO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth by Judge Rosenberg in his opinion at 143 N.J. Super. 396. See also, Williams v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 151 N.J. Super. 68 (App.Div. 1977).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DEODATO v. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY
(Nov 18, 1977)