Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HOWARD v. THE STATE.

DEEN, Presiding Judge.

The only enumeration of error in this case is that, after the defendant's counsel invoked the rule of sequestration of witnesses, the nominal prosecutor was excepted from the rule. Under the decision in James v. State, 143 Ga. App. 696, following Jarrell v. State, 234 Ga. 410, 420 ( 216 S.E.2d 258) and other cases, where the trial court exercises his discretion in allowing a police officer who is the nominal prosecutor to remain in the courtroom based on the district attorney's statement that he cannot fairly and adequately represent the state without such officer's assistance, the discretion of the court in allowing him to remain will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed. Webb and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 2, 1977 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 17, 1977.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOWARD v. STATE
(Nov 17, 1977)