Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE v. SMITH

PER CURIAM.

The majority of the Court of Appeals panel in this case and in People v Webb, 75 Mich. App. 494; 255 N.W.2d 661 (1977), believes that there is no appeal as a matter of right from a plea-based conviction. We disagree.

Const 1963, art 1, § 20, states in pertinent part: "In every criminal prosecution, the accused shall have * * * an appeal as a matter of right."

The appellate courts of this state have, until recently, consistently interpreted this language to guarantee an appeal as a matter of right from a plea-based conviction. Our review of those decisions, together with § 20's constitutional history and the plain meaning of its language, convinces us of the correctness of this interpretation.

See 1 Official Record, Constitutional Convention 1961, pp 469, 562-568.

Pursuant to GCR 1963, 853.2(4), in lieu of leave to appeal, the Court of Appeals order dismissing defendant's appeal for lack of jurisdiction is vacated. Defendant's appeal to the Court of Appeals is reinstated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the issue raised. We retain no jurisdiction.

KAVANAGH, C.J., and WILLIAMS, LEVIN, COLEMAN, FITZGERALD, RYAN, and BLAIR MOODY, JR., JJ., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SMITH
(Nov 28, 1977)