AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UPSHAW v. DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY CHILDREN SERVICES.

SHULMAN, Judge.

Appellant's parental rights were terminated by order of the juvenile court. He brings this appeal on several grounds, but we find it appropriate to address only one of them: the form and sufficiency of the order.

In Crook v. Dept. of Human Resources, 137 Ga. App. 817 ( 224 S.E.2d 806), this court held that explicit findings of fact and conclusions of law are required in an order terminating parental rights on the ground of deprivation. The required findings are set out in Code Ann. § 24A-3201 (a) (2). The findings in the order in this case are not sufficient under that standard.

"We remand the appeal with direction that the trial court vacate the judgment, cause appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law to be made, and enter a new judgment thereon, after which the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal. [Cit.]" Crook v. Dept. of Human Resources, supra, p. 819.

Appeal remanded with direction. Bell, C. J., and Banke, J., concur.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 8, 1977 — DECIDED DECEMBER 1, 1977.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UPSHAW v. DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY CHILDREN SERVICES
(Dec 1, 1977)