Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

W.S., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

W.S., a juvenile, was charged by petition for delinquency with robbery. He takes this appeal from an order adjudicating him delinquent and committing him to the Division of Youth Services. The sole question presented is whether the charge of robbery was established by substantial competent evidence.

We agree with the appellant that there was not substantial competent evidence to support a finding of robbery. However, the record does support a finding that W.S. was guilty of larceny. Therefore, we affirm the adjudication of delinquency, and remand the cause to the juvenile court for modification of the order consistent with this opinion.

Affirmed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

W.S. v. STATE
(Dec 13, 1977)