Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

SAM LEFRAK, Doing Business as MANDALAY LEASING CO., Appellant, v. KENNETH O. LAMBERT et al., Respondents

MEMORANDUM.

Judgment of the court below ( 89 Misc.2d 197) unanimously modified by increasing the amount of plaintiff's recovery to $4,222 plus attorney's fees in the sum of $750; as so modified, affirmed, without costs.

Defendant herein vacated his apartment before the expiration of his term and plaintiff relet it some months thereafter. It is our opinion that under the circumstances herein plaintiff is entitled to prevail on his cause of action to recover rent for the period that the apartment remained vacant.

While there seems to be a trend whereby the courts have been modernizing traditional concepts of landlord and tenant law and in some instances have held that a landlord is obligated to attempt to relet premises when a tenant vacates before the expiration of his term, we need not decide whether such rule should be adopted in the case at bar. The evidence adduced at trial established that plaintiff made reasonable and diligent efforts to rerent defendant's apartment (Birchwood Assoc. v Stern, 88 Misc.2d 937).

In addition, the record was sufficient to support a finding that plaintiff was entitled to the sum of $750 as reasonable attorney's fees.

Concur: PINO, P.J., RINALDI and BUSCHMANN, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEFRAK v. LAMBERT
(Jan 13, 1978)