Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROE HAROLD LANCE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BILLINGS, Chief Judge.

A Stoddard County jury convicted defendant of first degree robbery and fixed his punishment at 25 years imprisonment. Defendant's motion for new trial was overruled and the court granted allocution, rendered judgment and pronounced sentence.

The transcript filed herein shows that in entering judgment the clerk omitted the offense for which defendant was convicted. Rule 27.11, V.A.M.R., requires the judgment entered to state "briefly the offense for which such conviction shall have been had . . . ." See: State v. Lance, 561 S.W.2d 445 (Mo.App. 1978); State v. Wilke, 560 S.W.2d 601 (Mo.App. 1978); State v. Shipman, 560 S.W.2d 603 (Mo.App. 1978).

Defendant's appeal is ordered held in abeyance and the cause is remanded to the trial court for entry of judgment as required by Rule 27.11. Upon receipt of a supplemental transcript containing the proper judgment, the appeal will be re-submitted. State v. Wilke, supra.

It is so ordered.

Remanded with directions.

All concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. LANCE
(Jan 19, 1978)