In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 26, 1976, which, inter alia, granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The complaint alleges, inter alia, that the County of Nassau negligently failed to provide sufficient traffic controls and police protection to the infant plaintiff at the street corner where he was injured by a motor vehicle. Plaintiffs claim that increased vigilance on the part of the county was reasonably required in order to safely control the increased traffic flow on local streets resulting from a rise in the toll on the Southern State Parkway. However, it is well settled that the failure to provide special police and fire protection is not actionable by persons injured as a result of that failure (Motyka v City of Amsterdam, 15 N.Y.2d 134; Evers v Westerberg, 38 A.D.2d 751, affd 32 N.Y.2d 684). The County of Nassau had no special duty to provide additional traffic assistance at this intersection; nor did it voluntarily assume that duty. Therefore, the plaintiffs have no actionable claim against the county (see Pratt v Robinson, 39 N.Y.2d 554; Florence v Goldberg, 48 A.D.2d 917). Latham, J.P., Rabin, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.