BELL, Chief Judge.
Defendant was convicted of the attempted murder of his wife. Held:
1. Defendant orally objected at trial to the admission of a state exhibit on the ground that it was obtained by an illegal search and seizure. By failing to file a written motion to suppress this evidence as required by Code Ann. § 27-313, defendant waived any objection to the evidence on this ground. Brannen v. State, 117 Ga. App. 69 ( 159 S.E.2d 476).
2. Defendant enumerates as error the admission of an incriminating statement over his objection that he did not make a knowing and intelligent waiver of his Miranda rights by reason of his intoxication at the time. No error exists. There was ample evidence to show that defendant was properly given a Miranda warning, that he was in sufficient possession of a rational intellect and a free will to understand his Miranda rights when given, and that the admission was otherwise freely and voluntarily given. See Allen v. State, 231 Ga. 17, 18 (2) ( 200 S.E.2d 106). The admission of this statement has not been shown to be clearly erroneous and this is binding on the appellate courts. Person v. State, 235 Ga. 814 ( 221 S.E.2d 587).
Judgment affirmed. Shulman and Birdsong, JJ., concur.
SUBMITTED JANUARY 17, 1978 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 1, 1978.