Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEAROLD L. GRAY, et al., Appellees, v. AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY, Appellant.

OIL AND GAS — Interest on Royalties.

Per Curiam:

We granted petitions for review of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, entered in this case May 20, 1977, since similar questions are presented here as were before this court in Shutts, Executor v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 222 Kan. 527, 567 P.2d 1292. Our opinion in Shutts was filed July 11, 1977, and thus the Court of Appeals was not aware of that decision at the time it made its ruling.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed except as to the computation of interest. We hold that Amoco was obligated to pay interest as follows: 7% per annum simple interest on suspense royalties from the date suspense royalties were received by it until October 1, 1970 (the effective date of F.P.C. opinion No. 586); and 8% thereafter, computed as directed in Shutts, supra, pp. 568-569.

The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GRAY v. AMOCO PRODUCTION CO
(Jan 31, 1978)