THOMAS v. McGRATH, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Edward J. Toy, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Kenneth J. Grispin argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Read, Leib, Kraus and Grispin, attorneys; Mr. Walter L. Leib, of counsel).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Edward J. Toy, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Kenneth J. Grispin argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Read, Leib, Kraus and Grispin, attorneys; Mr. Walter L. Leib, of counsel).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

RUSSELL W. THOMAS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD W. McGRATH, UNION COUNTYPROSECUTOR, DEFENDANT, AND THE BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OFUNION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Morgan's dissenting opinion which is reported at 145 N.J. Super. 288, 296.

Three members of the Court would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of that Court.

For reversal — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices SULLIVAN, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 4.

For affirmance — Justices PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD — 3.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

THOMAS v. McGRATH

RUSSELL W. THOMAS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD W. McGRATH, UNION COUNTYPROSECUTOR, DEFENDANT, AND THE BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OFUNION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Comments