Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SHORTS v. THE STATE.

WEBB, Judge.

Shorts appeals his conviction for robbery, charging that the verdict was not supported by the evidence, and assigning error on the admission, over objection, of a photograph of him which he asserts was picked out as the result of impermissibly suggestive procedures which tainted the subsequent in-court identification. We affirm.

1. The evidence was sufficient to show that the photographic line-up was not impermissibly suggestive. Daniels v. State, 135 Ga. App. 549 ( 218 S.E.2d 274) (1975). Additionally, the trial court was warranted in accepting the victim's in-court identification as based upon his encounter with the accused rather than the photographic line-up. Yancey v. State, 232 Ga. 167 ( 205 S.E.2d 282) (1974).

2. The evidence amply supported the verdict.

Judgment affirmed. Quillian, P. J., and McMurray, J., concur.

WEBB, Judge.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 6, 1978 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 24, 1978.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHORTS v. STATE
(Feb 24, 1978)