KENNY v. BYRNE, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. William S. Greenberg argued the cause for appellants (
Greenberg
Mellk,
) Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney
Mr. Michael A. Santaniello, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief). Mr. Sanford Kluger argued the cause for amicus curiae Common Cause ( Mr. Henry Ramer, attorney).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. William S. Greenberg argued the cause for appellants (
Greenberg
Mellk,
) Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney
Mr. Michael A. Santaniello, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief). Mr. Sanford Kluger argued the cause for amicus curiae Common Cause ( Mr. Henry Ramer, attorney).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

WILLIAM E. KENNY AND CATHERINE McGOVERN HAVRILSKY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BRENDAN T. BYRNE, GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY AND INDIVIDUALLY; WILLIAM F.HYLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY AND INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL.,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justices HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.