SANNER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Douglas T. Hague argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman and Spitzer, attorneys; Mr. Morris Brown, on the brief). Mr. Joseph E. Zavesky argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Zavesky, Kelly, Madden Van Dorn, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Douglas T. Hague argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman and Spitzer, attorneys; Mr. Morris Brown, on the brief). Mr. Joseph E. Zavesky argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Zavesky, Kelly, Madden Van Dorn, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

MICHAEL J. SANNER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCECOMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 150 N.J. Super. 488. For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

SANNER v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY

MICHAEL J. SANNER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCECOMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Comments