Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ETHEL LEE BRYANT AND CLYDE BRYANT, PETITIONERS, v. THE HONORABLE GEORGE W. TEDDER AND THE HONORABLE STANTON S. KAPLAN, CIRCUIT JUDGES OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The issue involved in this cause is exactly the same as was decided in Morales v. Moore, 356 So.2d 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Accordingly, we hereby exercise our discretion to treat the suggestion for writ of prohibition as a petition for writ of certiorari. For the reasons set out in Morales, the petition is granted; and the order denying the petitioner's motion to strike is quashed, with directions that an order be entered excluding podiatrists from the list of prospective members of the medical mediation panel.

ALDERMAN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRYANT v. TEDDER
(Apr 4, 1978)