Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROSARIO R. RIZZUTO, APPELLANT, v. PHILIP E. DiPAOLO, III, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff/appellant seeks to appeal an order which reads "that defendant's motion for summary judgment is hereby granted." This is not a final decision, order, judgment, or decree within the contemplation of Fla. R.App.P. 3.2(b). Likewise, the case is not one which formerly would have been cognizable in equity so the order is not subject to an interlocutory appeal. Fla.R.App.P. 4.2(a). Since we have no jurisdiction, the appeal, sua sponte, is dismissed. Arnold v. Brady, 178 So.2d 732 (Fla.2d DCA 1965); Renard v. Kirkeby Hotels, 99 So.2d 719 (Fla.3d DCA 1958).

GRIMES, A.C.J., and OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RIZZUTO v. DiPAOLO
(Apr 19, 1978)