Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

WILLIAMS, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

HANLEY, J.

The defendant in error, Dennis W. Williams, was convicted of burglary and attempted theft contrary to secs. 943.10(1) (a), 943.20(1) (a) and 939.32(1), Stats. The action against Williams was consolidated for trial with the action against William E. Stewart. Both actions arose out of the same incident. Both defendants appealed, although the appeals were not consolidated.

One principle issue, common to both appeals, is raised by this defendant: Is the evidence sufficient to support the conviction? This issue is disposed of in the opinion in the companion case, Stewart v. State, 83 Wis.2d 185, 265 N.W.2d 489 (1978), decided this day.

By the Court. — Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to dismiss.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLIAMS v. STATE
(May 2, 1978)