Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

TIMOTHY DANIEL LINEBERRY v. TONY (NMN) WILSON

Appeal and Error 6.7 — denial of motion to add liability insurer as defendant-premature appeal Purported appeal from the denial of plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint to add defendant's automobile liability insurer as a party defendant in plaintiff's action to recover for injuries suffered when he was struck by defendant's automobile is dismissed as premature. G.S. 1-277 (a).

VAUGHN, Judge.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries allegedly suffered by plaintiff when struck by an automobile operated by defendant. Defendant answered and denied negligence, among other things. Thereafter, plaintiff moved to amend his complaint to "[a]dd Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company to the list of defendants" and, in substance, to allege that defendant had in effect an automobile liability insurance policy with Nationwide. Plaintiff now attempts to appeal from the denial of his motion. The purported appeal is not from an order "which affects a substantial right claimed in any action or proceeding; or which in effect determines the action, and prevents a judgment from which an appeal might be taken; or discontinues the action, or grants or refuses a new trial." G.S. 1-277 (a). The attempted appeal is, therefore, fragmentary and premature.

We must also note that appellant has attempted to file a "Reply Brief," a practice expressly prohibited by Rule 28 (h) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Judges MORRIS and MARTIN concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LINEBERRY v. WILSON
(Jun 1, 1978)