AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

BARBARA BARRETT, Appellant, v. STATE MUTUAL LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. We agree that the Appellate Division was not bound by its earlier determination, as the law of the case, because of the additional and persuasive evidence on the second trial. On the merits we find that the defendant was entitled to a directed verdict for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division ( 58 A.D.2d 320; see, also, Process Plants Corp. v Beneficial Nat. Life Ins. Co., 42 N.Y.2d 928, affg 53 A.D.2d 214).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARRETT v. STATE MUTUAL LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
(May 31, 1978)