AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

EMERY ROTH SONS, Appellant, v. NATIONAL KINNEY CORPORATION et al., Respondents, and RICHARD ROTH, SR., et al., Appellants.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified to the extent of providing that the third counterclaim be dismissed and, except as so modified, affirmed, with costs to appealing defendants. The question certified is answered in the negative.

In its third counterclaim, defendant seeks damages for counsel fees and other expenses incurred in connection with reobtaining possession of the demised premises, putting such premises in good order and preparing them for rerental. However, by failing to assert these claims in the prior summary proceeding based on nonpayment of rent, defendant has impermissibly split a cause of action and is barred from asserting them as a counterclaim in this action (930 Fifth Corp. v King, 42 N.Y.2d 886, 887-888; Century Factors v New Plan Realty Corp., 41 N.Y.2d 1040, 1041; Columbia Corrugated Container v Skyway Container Corp., 37 A.D.2d 845, affd 32 N.Y.2d 818).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order modified, with costs to appealing defendants, in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed. Question certified answered in the negative.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROTH SONS v. NATIONAL KINNEY CORPORATION
(Jun 8, 1978)