Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHATTAHOOCHEE PLANTATION CLUB, LTD. et al. v. ROBMAC, INC. et al.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the grant of an interlocutory injunction enjoining foreclosure on real estate pending a resolution of the appellees' claims of fraud and breach of express warranty. We are not convinced that the trial court applied an erroneous theory of law, that the evidence was insufficient to support the injunction, that appellees were required to tender disputed payments in order to seek equitable relief, or that appellants had an adequate remedy at law. We find no manifest abuse of discretion. Code § 55-108; Columbus, Ga. v. Granco, Inc., 240 Ga. 850 ( 242 S.E.2d 607) (1978); Doughtie v. Dennisson, 238 Ga. 695 ( 235 S.E.2d 379) (1977).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

PER CURIAM.

ARGUED JUNE 13, 1978 — DECIDED JUNE 28, 1978.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHATTAHOOCHEE PLANTATION CLUB, LTD. v. ROBMAC, INC
(Jun 28, 1978)