AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of CROSSMAN CADILLAC, INC., Respondent, v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS OF THE COUNTY OF NASSAU et al., Appellants.

MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed, with costs. The privately owned telephone system installed in petitioner's business premises is not assessable as real property under section 102 (subd 12, par [d]) of the Real Property Tax Law, aimed principally at expanding the definition of real property with respect to utility companies (see Matter of Crystal v City of Syracuse, 47 A.D.2d 29, 31, affd 38 N.Y.2d 883). The telephone system, which includes 26 telephone instruments, an apparatus cabinet, and 10 trunk relays, is removable without significant injury to the premises and is capable of reinstallation elsewhere. Hence, the movable equipment does not raise the issue reserved in the caveat in Matter of Crystal with reference to systems "incorporated as part of the real estate" (Matter of Crystal v City of Syracuse, 38 N.Y.2d 883, affg 47 A.D.2d 29, supra; see Matter of Metropolitan Bank of Syracuse v Department of Assessment, 44 N.Y.2d 864, affg on mem at 57 A.D.2d 1055). If equipment such as that involved in this case should be assessable as real property the remedy is legislative rather than by strained or distortive judicial decisional analysis.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CROSSMAN CADILLAC v. BOARD OF ASSESSORS
(Jul 6, 1978)