Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Esther POKLEMBA, Individually and as the Administratrix of the Estate of Stephen F. Poklemba, Esquire, Appellant v. SHAMOKIN STATE GENERAL HOSPITAL, Appellee, and Robert Greco, Anne L. Cawthern, Mrs. Neal Little, Helen Wahosky, and Quilla Mowery

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Appellant Esther Poklemba, both individually and as administratrix of decedent's estate, brought an action in trespass against appellee Shamokin State General Hospital and others for negligent medical treatment of decedent, her husband. The Commonwealth Court dismissed the complaint against appellee on the ground that appellee, as an agency of the Commonwealth, was protected against suit by the sovereign immunity of the Commonwealth.

We have this day abrogated the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways, 479 Pa. 384, 388 A.2d 709 (1978). We therefore reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court and remand for further proceedings.

Order reversed and case remanded.

We hear this appeal pursuant to the Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act of 1970, Act of July 31, 1970, P.L. 673, art. II, § 203, 17 Pa.C.S.A. § 211.203 (Supp. 1978).

O'BRIEN, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which EAGEN, C. J., and POMEROY, J., joined.

POMEROY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which EAGEN, C. J., and O'BRIEN, J., joined.

O'BRIEN, Justice, dissenting.

I dissent. This Court has no power to abrogate Article I, § 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. See Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways, 479 Pa. 384, 388 A.2d 709 (1978) (Dissenting Opinion by O'Brien, J.).

EAGEN, C. J., and POMEROY, J., join in this dissenting opinion.

POMEROY, Justice, dissenting.

For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways, 479 Pa. 384, 408, 388 A.2d 709, 721 (1978), I dissent.

EAGEN, C. J., and O'BRIEN, J., join in this dissenting opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

POKLEMBA v. SHAMOKIN STATE GEN. HOSP
(Jul 14, 1978)