BITUMINOUS INS. CO. v. PETTY

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 6613.

Attorney(S)

Brame, Bergstedt Brame, David A. Fraser, Lake Charles, for third-party defendant,
third-party plaintiffs-
Plauche, Smith, Hebert Nieset, Reid K. Hebert, Lake Charles, for defendants-
Burton Nichols by James K. Nichols, DeRidder, for defendant-

Judges

John Michael Guidry

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 6613.

Attorney(S)

Brame, Bergstedt Brame, David A. Fraser, Lake Charles, for third-party defendant,
third-party plaintiffs-
Plauche, Smith, Hebert Nieset, Reid K. Hebert, Lake Charles, for defendants-
Burton Nichols by James K. Nichols, DeRidder, for defendant-

Judges

John Michael Guidry

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

BITUMINOUS INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. H. D. PETTY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, GEORGE W. CLINE, III, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

GUIDRY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Gus Stacy, Jr., et al. v. H. D. Petty, et al., 362 So.2d 810 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1978), our Docket No. 6614, we conclude that the judgment of the district court properly disposes of the issues presented. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed at appellants' cost.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

BITUMINOUS INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. H. D. PETTY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, GEORGE W. CLINE, III, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Comments