Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE v. BERRY

PER CURIAM.

Defendant pled guilty to robbery armed, MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797, and possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony, MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.424(2).

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion to withdraw his plea because there was an inadequate factual basis. We find that the proper factual basis was established and that the trial court did not err.

However, we do not believe defendant's conviction under the felony-firearm statute is constitutionally valid. See Wayne County Prosecutor v Recorder's Court Judge, 85 Mich. App. 727; 272 N.W.2d 587 (1978), People v Mitchell, 85 Mich. App. 757; 272 N.W.2d 601 (1978) (N.J. KAUFMAN, J., dissenting), People v Gerald Hughes, 85 Mich. App. 8; 270 N.W.2d 692 (1978) (D.F. WALSH, J., dissenting). Though we find the robbery armed charge a necessarily included offense of the felony-firearm charge, we choose to vacate the conviction under the felony-firearm statute and affirm the robbery armed conviction. Wayne County Prosecutor v Recorder's Court Judge, supra.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

N.J. KAUFMAN, P.J. (concurring).

I concur separately for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinions in People v Walter Johnson 85 Mich. App. 654; 272 N.W.2d 605 (1978), People v Mitchell, 85 Mich. App. 757; 272 N.W.2d 601 (1978), and People v Drake Johnson, 85 Mich. App. 752; 272 N.W.2d 599 (1978).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BERRY
(Sep 20, 1978)