AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MAURICE VERSCHELL, Respondent, v. HELENE S. PIKE, Formerly Known as HELENE VERSCHELL, Appellant.

In an action, inter alia, to set aside a conveyance, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 24, 1978, which granted a motion by plaintiff's former attorney for a protective order. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. The attorney-client privilege should be raised by a witness at the time of the examination before trial. Should the examiner improperly seek information regarding privileged matters, a witness may then exercise his right to claim privilege (Matter of Macku, 29 A.D.2d 539). It does not presently appear that any aspect of the prospective examination in the instant case relates to privileged communications. Hopkins, J.P., Martuscello, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VERSCHELL v. PIKE
(Oct 30, 1978)