Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Julian R. Murray, Jr., New Orleans, La., John L. Diasselliss, III, LaPlace, La., for petitioner-
  • Melvin P. Barre,
  • , Parish of Jefferson, Abbott J. Reeves,
  • ,
  • , Research Appeals
  • , Gretna, La., Roland St. Martin, Edgard, La., for respondents-
Judges
  • Robert Andrew Ainsworth
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Julian R. Murray, Jr., New Orleans, La., John L. Diasselliss, III, LaPlace, La., for petitioner-
  • Melvin P. Barre,
  • , Parish of Jefferson, Abbott J. Reeves,
  • ,
  • , Research Appeals
  • , Gretna, La., Roland St. Martin, Edgard, La., for respondents-
Judges
  • Robert Andrew Ainsworth
See more information ...
Smart Summary

MARK DWAYNE SMITH, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. LLOYD B. JOHNSON, SHERIFF, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM:

After an affirmance of a state court conviction of a criminal offense the defendant, who is the appellant here, sought habeas corpus relief in the United States district court. The judgment of that court, denying relief, is before this Court on appeal. The opinion of the district court sets forth the facts from which the controversy arose and the law applicable in its disposition. Smith v. Johnson, 458 F. Supp. 289. The decision of the district court is correct and its judgment is

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

SMITH v. JOHNSON
(Nov 27, 1978)