Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEORGIA MARBLE COMPANY v. STRICKLAND.

PER CURIAM.

The Georgia Marble Company brought this action seeking refund of Georgia and MARTA sales and use taxes paid by the plaintiff in purchasing certain rock crushing equipment it contends is exempt from sales and use tax under the manufacturing machinery exemption provided in Ga. L. 1963, p. 13; Ga. L. 1966, p. 537 (Code Ann. § 92-3403A C (2) (n) (2)). Both parties moved for summary judgment. The Revenue Commissioner's motion for summary judgment denying refund was granted and the taxpayer appeals. We reverse. Chilivis v. Marble Products Co., 135 Ga. App. 187 ( 217 S.E.2d 441) (1975).

In addition to taking the position that none of the equipment was exempt, the Revenue Commissioner argued that certain of the claims were barred by the statute of limitations. We, however, agree with appellant Georgia Marble that the statute of limitations on the claim for refund commenced, as does the period during which interest is payable upon refunds, with the payment of the taxes by the vendor to the State Revenue Commissioner and not by the payment by the purchaser to the vendor. Ga. L. 1975, pp. 156, 159-61; Code Ann. § 92-8436 (a), (b).

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur, except Nichols, C. J., Hall and Marshall, JJ., who concur in the judgment only, and Undercofler, P.J., and Hill, J., who dissent.

PER CURIAM.

ARGUED NOVEMBER 15, 1978 — DECIDED JANUARY 31, 1979 — REHEARING DENIED FEBRUARY 27, 1979.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GEORGIA MARBLE COMPANY v. STRICKLAND
(Jan 31, 1979)