Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RUTHERFORD et al. v. AYERS et al.

SMITH, Judge.

Appellants contend the trial court's grant of appellee's motion for summary judgment was erroneous because the evidence adduced below presented material issues of fact for submission to the jury. However, in his brief appellants' attorney does not cite any specific portion of the record in support of the claim of error, and, because of this failure to carry the appellate burden, we must affirm the judgment of the trial court. Rule 18 of Court of Appeals (Code Ann. § 24-3618); Rambo v. Fulton Financial Corp., 145 Ga. App. 791 ( 245 S.E.2d 12) (1978).

Judgment affirmed. Quillian, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

ARGUED JANUARY 15, 1979 — DECIDED MARCH 1, 1979.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUTHERFORD v. AYERS
(Mar 1, 1979)