Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GRESHAM v. THE STATE.

QUILLIAN, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Held:

1. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion with regard to limiting cross examination of a state's witness. Johnson v. State, 137 Ga. App. 308, 309 ( 223 S.E.2d 500); Hodge v. State, 239 Ga. 612 ( 238 S.E.2d 404).

2. It was not error for a different judge to preside and impose sentence than the one who presided at the defendant's first trial.

3. On appeal this court does not consider the weight of the evidence but only the sufficiency thereof. Minor v. State, 139 Ga. App. 168 ( 228 S.E.2d 33). The evidence here was ample to sustain the verdict.

4. Although not specifically urged as a deprivation of his right to a speedy trial, the defendant points out that he was indicted approximately three years before he was tried. He contends this was unfair since he could not remember the circumstances concerning the time of the alleged offense.

No issue in this regard was raised in the court below. Moreover, the defendant testified he left the state in May of 1975 (the indictment charged he sold a controlled substance on May 8, 1975) and did not return until August, 1978. No basis for reversal is therefore presented. Moore v. State, 141 Ga. App. 245, 248 ( 233 S.E.2d 236); State v. Madden, 242 Ga. 637 ( 250 S.E.2d 484).

Judgment affirmed. Smith and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 8, 1979 — DECIDED MARCH 13, 1979.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GRESHAM v. STATE
(Mar 13, 1979)