Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 62 A.D.2d 932). In addition, the record does not support the contention that respondent made misleading representations to appellant regarding her entitlement to receive benefits under the salary continuation plan.
Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG.