Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM MINARICH, Also Known as BILLY MINARICH, and CHRISTOPHER LEE MINARICH, Appellants.

MEMORANDUM.

The orders of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and the cases remitted for a new trial.

The Appellate Division correctly held, and indeed the People concede, that James Longtin was an accomplice as a matter of law (CPL 60.22, subd 2; see People v Beaudet, 32 N.Y.2d 371). The trial court was therefore required to instruct the jury that Longtin was an accomplice, and that defendants could not be convicted on Longtin's testimony absent corroborative evidence (CPL 60.22, subd 1). "Failure to so charge the jury was necessarily harmful error" (People v Jenner, 29 N.Y.2d 695, 696-697).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur in memorandum.

Orders reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MINARICH
(Mar 22, 1979)