Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WALTER LEE BROWN, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. W. J. ESTELLE, JR., DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons set forth by the trial court in its opinion, Brown v. Estelle, S.D. Tex. 1978, the trial court's grant of a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.

It appears that, under Texas law, an error in sentencing proceedings before a jury requires the state Appellate Court to reverse the entire conviction, not merely to remand for resentencing. Tex. Code Crim. Pro. Art. 44.24(b); Bullard v. State, Tex.Cr. App. 1977, 548 S.W.2d 13, 18; Ellison v. State, Tex.Cr.App. 1968, 432 S.W.2d 955, 957. Accordingly, the District Court's judgment is modified in part as follows: The State shall be given the option either of retrying or resentencing the appellee within 120 days, as may be appropriate under Texas law.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BROWN v. ESTELLE
(Mar 21, 1979)