Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

MOUNT LAUREL TOWNSHIP, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. LOCAL FINANCE BOARD OF THEDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the Appellate Division opinion, reported at 166 N.J. Super. 254 (1978). Only under limited circumstances, not here pertinent, may a municipal expenditure be made prior to an appropriation. See, e.g., Home Owners Construction Co. v. Borough of Glen Rock, 34 N.J. 305 , 315-316 (1961); Essex Cty. Bd. of Taxation v. City of Newark, 73 N.J. 69, 74 (1977).

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MOUNT LAUREL TOWNSHIP v. LOCAL FINANCE BOARD
(Mar 16, 1979)