Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES DAVID BRUCKMAN, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Inasmuch as defendant failed to object to the verdict as returned by the jury, his claim of repugnancy was not preserved for appellate review. (See People v Parks, 59 A.D.2d 543, 544; People v Incherchera, 56 A.D.2d 852; cf. Matter of Oliver v Justices of N.Y. Supreme Ct. of N.Y. County, 36 N.Y.2d 53, 58; People v Quilles, 48 A.D.2d 933.)

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BRUCKMAN
(Mar 29, 1979)