AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ROSETON HILLS SEWAGE-WORKS CORP., Respondent, v. MIKE LEITMAN et al., Defendants, and CHARLES S. BALDWIN et al., Appellants.

In a condemnation proceeding, the defendants Baldwin appeal from a final order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated July 11, 1978, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, fixed the compensation for the taking. Final order and judgment, modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto awarding costs in the Supreme Court to the appellants, with costs to the respondent on this appeal. Trial Term erred only in not awarding costs to the appellants, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 16 of the Condemnation Law, since no offer of compensation was made by respondent to the appellants prior to initiation of the condemnation proceeding. Mollen, P.J., Suozzi, O'Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROSETON HILLS SEWAGE-WORKS CORP. v. LEITMAN
(Apr 9, 1979)